National audit firm Grant Thornton and two of its partners have settled federal charges that they ignored red flags and fraud risks while conducting deficient audits of two publicly traded companies that wound up facing Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) enforcement actions for improper accounting and other violations.
Grant Thornton admitted wrongdoing and agreed to forfeit approximately $1.5 million in audit fees and interest plus pay a $3 million penalty.
Melissa Koeppel was an engagement partner on the deficient audits of both companies, and Jeffrey Robinson was an engagement partner on one of the deficient audits, which spanned from 2009 to 2011 and involved senior housing provider Assisted Living Concepts (ALC) and alternative energy company Broadwind Energy.
Grant Thornton and Robinson were represented by Gary Orseck of Robbins, Russell, Englert, Orseck, Untereiner & Sauber in Washington, D.C.
Koeppel was represented by Catherine Joyce of Winston & Strawn in Chicago.
An SEC investigation found that Grant Thornton and the engagement partners repeatedly violated professional standards, and their inaction allowed the companies to make numerous false and misleading public filings.
“Audit firms must be held responsible when systemic failures such as inadequate engagement procedures, staffing, or supervision cause the firms’ work to fall significantly short of expected standards, particularly when multiple audits and engagements are involved,” said SEC enforcement chief Andrew J. Ceresney. “Grant Thornton was aware of red flags suggesting audit quality issues in the audits conducted by one of its engagement partners and its audit quality more generally, but failed to remedy the situation.”
Last December, the SEC announced fraud charges against two former ALC executives accused of making false disclosures and manipulating internal books and records by listing fake occupants at some senior residences in order to meet lease covenant requirements.
Earlier this year, the SEC charged Broadwind and senior officers with accounting and disclosure violations that prevented investors from knowing that reduced business was damaging the company’s long-term financial prospects.
In the ALC audit, Grant Thornton, Koeppel, and Robinson knew or should have known that heightened scrutiny was warranted with respect to the effects of ALC’s calculations of occupancy and coverage ratio covenants in a lease pursuant to which ALC operated eight assisted living facilities.
The firm and both partners were aware of repeated red flags surrounding ALC’s claim that it had an agreement with the lessor to meet lease covenants by treating ALC employees and other non-residents as occupants of the facilities.
They violated professional auditing standards by failing to take reasonable steps to determine that an agreement with the lessor existed or that ALC employees whom ALC claimed to be occupants of the facilities were actually staying there.
During the Broadwind engagement, Grant Thornton and Koeppel relied almost exclusively on unsupported management representations that a $58 million impairment charge had not occurred ahead of a significant public offering by Broadwind, even after learning of management’s own expectation of impairment and other facts establishing impairment.
Grant Thornton and Koeppel failed to obtain adequate audit evidence to support management’s conclusion that the impairment had occurred after the offering.
They also failed to exercise due professional care and skepticism or obtain adequate audit evidence related to a significant bill-and-hold transaction. The revenue from this transaction allowed Broadwind to meet its debt covenants.
The SEC said that as a result of these and other deficiencies, Grant Thornton issued audit reports containing unqualified opinions on ALC’s 2009, 2010, and 2011 financial statements and Broadwind’s 2009 financial statements that inaccurately stated the audits had been conducted in accordance with PCAOB standards.